![](http://lh4.ggpht.com/_FoXyvaPSnVk/S40PYaKVcsI/AAAAAAACkTA/B-C8PkX8HyM/2010-FEB-Post-Under.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7Y1uz0bRTEFbhBoOaC8ldOh-HcjAuYt9qjeXRhR6apXQPRnH7op4VMW9sTnvniIko05BZZXqY6OfOsVsNZjG160DPs31EPs3RV3kHmHRl-JxLSJ-MyqXLAjxx9Mu6FS30WTfJyod01HU/s800/Detroit-3-0.jpg)
Sean McAlinden, an economist working for the Center for Automotive Research, says that due to shifts in UAW retiree / health planning US auto manufacturers may end up with a labor-cost advantage in the next few years. GM is used as the prime example.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiopd5bK6dc2tNuUMl9tG_0A8ZXOrZ53H6SMf7Fmr30g1Kg3ndESy6j85yy3cNdH4Mn1bpy5wgmBJJ9jbyugbFWQyioZA9ynPrloauECBbvzcnGjjqoh6Zz5CzvKY8A9T6N5rZSoaQpN8A/s200/Detroit-3-2.jpg)
In 2007, per-vehicle labor costs for GM were $1,400 more than Toyota, its largest international competitor. $950 of that was for retiree benefits.
In 2008, Detroit's Big 3 manufacturers (Ford, GM and Chrysler LLC) were reportedly paying their hourly employees $69,368 per year on average versus $70,185 being earned by employees at foreign-owned plants. Salaried employees at the Detroit automakers were making $122,963 versus $81,506 earned by foreign-based counterparts.
Now, after all the re-negotiations, GM is working towards a new goal: "[hiring] more workers at the lower wage and it [hiring] fewer skilled-trades workers, who make more money than other factory workers".
With 2,300 new employees working under the revised wage/retirement plans, GM's employees are only $2 more costly than Toyota's. McAlinden predicts that over the next 5 years, GM may even undercut Toyota's pay by up to $10.
By Phil Alex
Via: AP / AN (Sub. Req)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhaecaAA0CRMm0nmhWzYE0fJlIT9-OHhRklBYVnatkxDs8-A5nNN2bOBEQebmBwCXtuRZSKbIMs47aD0XSj2wNb0kAnW2ZZ4yIwtIa2rraNuD7KEfwP4ci35xri7Ky0-6G0fMAFOCkjJUc/s400/Detroit-3-1.jpg)
0 comments:
Post a Comment